So in a recent AP column, Michael Blood says it's up to Andrew Breitbart to prove that Tea Partiers didn't yell the N-word in Washington last Sunday.
He writes:
"Conservative columnist Andrew Breitbart disputed accounts that tea party activists in Washington shouted racial epithets at black members of Congress amid the health care debate, although he didn't provide any evidence."
Although he didn't provide any evidence."
Okay, this would be funny if it wasn't so slimy.
I mean, first of all - The burden of proof is on the person making the accusation. And get this: Breitbart put up 100 grand, to be donated to the United Negro College Fund - if anyone provided evidence. So far, nothing - which is why the AP writer, is left grasping for brain cells.
Look, this debate is basic: it's small government vs. big government. So how cowardly do folks like Blood and Frank Rich have to be that they can't man up and defend their love for collectivism? The only reason they scream race, is because that debate scares them. They know a racial accusation prevents dialogue, because such a harmful charge far outweighs any benefits of winning an argument.
But next time someone says it's about race, Simply say, "Is that all you got?" and then ask them these five questions:
1. How could adding 32 million people to the health rolls SAVE us money?
2. How is hiring 14,000 new IRS Agents to enforce this NOT an expansion of government?
3. How can you be considered a "child" for the sake of health care until you are 26 years old?
4. How is forcing everyone to buy something constitutional?
5. How could there be no tort reform in this?
If they respond "you're just asking that because he's black," then respond with, "you're just saying it because I'm hot."
Then take their wallet.
Say you're "spreading the wealth around."
No comments:
Post a Comment